| Too expensive, too few results, the robot can be just as good. |
|
|
|
![]() Shoe print of Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin on the moon On space missions is discussed, comes the inevitable argument that manned space travel is too expensive. For an average person, the cost of a major research project or a manned space mission enormous. Compared with the budget of large countries and organizations, and compared with what is spent for other things, the costs of space science and almost negligible. With the money, for instance, the NBC television for the broadcasting rights of the Olympic Games in 2008 has paid, if you had the complete Large Hadron Collider be able to finance. With the tax money that year, only in Germany is wasted; it could be a manned flight to Mars afford, which is about 30 billion euros. Germany could therefore actually a separate, manned mission to Mars, without a lot of money to have to rise - you should only use existing meaningful.
To some bankers to save that which the gambling verspekuliert were
quickly loose huge amounts of money made. 700 billion U.S. dollars in
the U.S. alone - so we would have complete seven Apollo programs can
finance. "Too expensive" is not an argument against human spaceflight.
|
|
| Last Updated ( Saturday, 25 July 2009 ) |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|














